mark berg 2000 bitcoins

bitcoins mining nvidia shield

Bernard W. Dempsey, S. In a centralized economy, currency is issued by a central bank at a rate that is supposed to match the growth of the amount of goods that are exchanged so that these goods can be traded with stable prices. The monetary base is controlled by a central bank.

Mark berg 2000 bitcoins cftc registered binary options brokers

Mark berg 2000 bitcoins

Russell F. What a mind blowing interview. Well done Real Vision team! This will be looked back on in several decades as seminal. Saylor is the alpha chad. Steve G. This guy seems to be surrounded by people who just agree with whatever he says because a lot of his ideas only sound good at face value. For example, he says gold is a bad store of value because we can simply mine more of it Yaniv R.

No, his point was that if the price of gold will go a lot higher smart people will find ways to mine more and faster just like oil and fracking. Jay V. We have seen mining costs rise into the of the market price of gold in the past. Christopher C. Brilliant interview with a lot to digest. I may have missed it, but does Mr. Saylor mention any personal investment in BTC or just the company? Daniel W. He already told that half of his board was invested in BTC before he pitched to buy So, yes he is also invested personally in BTC.

Travis N. This was a very insightful interview and an amazing insight into a very successful person. Totally agree on his view on bitcoins value. Gold has stood the test of time when measured against tangible goods House, suit, etc Nicolas G. Another masterpiece of Raoul and RV. Thank you!!! Michael is another brilliant salesman and history teller, like Raoul. It is a little sad to me to see that RV gives only one side of the history, the crypto hype.

And that it does not educate audience about its potential risks, not just from balanced portfolio risk perspective, but also from technological or governmental perspective. Looking to this comments section I see people over-hyped, making irrational investment decissions based on a superior, but biased in my opinion narrative, which was just the opposite of what RV was about, EDUCATE people in macro, finances and investing.

I am afraid that having so much at stake irresponsibly long may not help to bring a balanced view of the risks entailed by owning lots of ECDSA-based cryptos. I hope they do it in the new RV Crypto. JWD I. Appreciate your concerns. It would be good to have interviews focused on the points you have raised. There's has been a lot of thought and discussion around quantum computing and its impact on bitcoin. I'd suggest for anybody more reading and watching into this topic, but it doesn't seem to be the threat you imply and definitely something that has been considered and is actively considered and monitored.

There are known best practices already used to mitigate impact, e. Daniel B. Not the "quantum computer" talk again. This has been debunked a ton of times. There are several technical articles discussing why Quantum Computers are not a threat to BTC in any way.

This is just FUD. Bitcoin already has some built-in quantum resistance. If you only use Bitcoin addresses one time, which has always been the recommended practice, then your ECDSA public key is only ever revealed at the one time that you spend bitcoins sent to each address. A quantum computer would need to be able to break your key in the short time between when your transaction is first sent and when it gets into a block.

It will likely be decades after a quantum computer first breaks a Bitcoin key before quantum computers become this fast. All of the commonly-used public-key algorithms are broken by QC. Public-key crypto that is secure against QC does exist, however. Currently, Bitcoin experts tend to favor a cryptosystem based on Lamport signatures. Lamport signatures are very fast to compute, but they have two major downsides: The signature would be quite large, at least several kB times larger than now.

This would be very bad for Bitcoin's overall scalability, since bandwidth is one of the main limiting factors to Bitcoin's scaling. Advances in scalability such as Segregated Witness the signature is part of the witness and Lightning will be helpful. At the time that you create each keypair, you would need to set some finite maximum number of times that you can sign with this key.

Signing more than this number of times would be insecure. Increasing the signing limit increases the size of each signature even more. Since you are only really supposed to use addresses once, this may not be a huge problem for Bitcoin. A new public-key algorithm can be added to Bitcoin as a softfork. From the end-user perspective, this would appear as the creation of a new address type, and everyone would need to send their bitcoins to this new address type to achieve quantum security.

You mention that this has been considered. Yes, it has been, almost since the times of Satoshi, but it has not been addressed because this implies an overhaul of BTC that will damage the immutability perception of BTC. When you say 'it does not seem the threat you Do you know why? To Paco N. When a BTC developer, whose entire wealth is tied to BTC, says QC does not exists and will not be a threat without giving any evidence, I cannot count it as one time debunked. A new public-key algorithm can be added to bitcoin as a soft fork: - Can you tell me which new one you can add, which is Quantum Resistant QR , but which does not entail a hard fork?

So BTC core is compromising future security in exchange for low noise among the new holders today, specially those new entrants like Michael Saylor. You would be legally attacking the property of somebody By the way, you missed the other common misconception of BTC maximalists, if a QC ever exists, Banks, Internet and everything will be in danger. Who will migrate them? Nobody, they are sitting ducks.

If you want to believe there is zero threat, fine. But do not block information to others, that are not that knowledgeable as you are, so that they can make their own rational decisions. In any case thank you for the debate. This forms already a sort of more balanced view ;. To Nicolas G. Note I don't claim anywhere bitcoin is currently quantum resistant, but I provide some nuance to your post where it sounds like nobody is aware of quantum computing and the great reckoning is just around the corner.

That is IMO clearly not the case and I provide some facts to back this up. To me this isn't the place for a highly technical discussion, but anybody interested should definitely do more research, so yes thank you for that suggestion. There are theoretical weaknesses in Bitcoin with regards to quantum computing. These will need to be addressed at some point and they are recognized as such. However currently there is no reason to consider this an irrational investment decision as this is all still very hypothetical Matt D.

Hi Nicolas, Thanks for this discussion. I am wondering now if you have been working on this pre-Satoshi? Anyway, nice to read your comments. Jakub B. Prashanth R. Cory M. Soeren V. Loving Michael's energy and how he walks us through his learning journey and thought process about bitcoin! I think I've never seen a better rational reasoning of why one should choose BTC over legacy products. Fantastic choice to gain a perspective from the corporate world.

Absolutely loved this interview and that's exactly why I signed up for Real Vision! Thanks Raoul, thanks team Real Vision! Brady N. I've always thought of bitcoins price as a gold monetary price void of its utility, remove the atoms from gold and what remains is a belief.

It's no longer a commodity but a belief in an agreement or social contract. Erik W. John S. The thing is if that government does create that network, then it has to be decentralized otherwise why would anyone use it. China are already creating their own digital currency, but outside of Chinese citizens who are forced to use it I don't see why anyone else would ever want to be at their mercy.

If any government creates that network, it'll have to convince other governments and citizens to buy into it and use it, while there is a neutral alternative in Bitcoin. Also, Bitcoin is still in its early days, in a few years that cost will have gone up a lot, but that's just a guess. Joseph H. That was fantastic, really entertaining and great through processes. Thanks Michael. Lorenzo B. Playing devil's advocate here, pls feel free to bury me under a huge pile of shame and insults There are roughly kk transactions dealt everyday in BTC that is let's say the daily number of total transactions for a very small city or large village Shouldn't the very last bitcoin to be mined supposed to be worth a value that tends to infinity, and an infinite amount of energy be required to mine it?

I hope any of this makes sense Oliver B. I don't have the real number in new Fiat, so the BTC price stays the same. If the net-inflow of Fiat is more than that, BTC prices in the long run will go up, otherwise they will go down and miners go out of business, thus adjusting the cost-base of the network downwards.

I think it is definitely something to take into consideration if you take Michael Saylor's year view: Do you want to pass down an asset to your descendants that will require at least 6 - 7, TWh to just stay around? Thank you for your thoughts Oliver, that is exactly one of the point that I'm trying to understand. But again, I am no expert so I wish someone with some real technical knowledge could shed some light on the issue between: number of total miners-proof of work-energy consumption-price.

As long as price go up, I suppose any number of mining participants at any energy cost is acceptable: in this case we have an energy consumption sustainability issue If price stays the same or doesn't increase enough you will have less participants in the mining activity again taking into account the energy cost constrain: how will that affect the whole network and BTC reliability?

Maybe RV could do some in-depths on these matters. Glenis B. I think it's all relative. In a year or 2 will we be talking about those "who were skilfull, brave and lucky enough" to buy the dip? Jeff S. Sorry to be contrarian, but this video was all about traditional investing, or more specifically, all the historical alpha Saylor so proudly shares from his past.

Then this tradFi guy stumbles onto to BTC after dismissing it not so long ago, and makes a big trade. But there is so little value shared here in terms of crypto investing! Maybe move this one out and put it in the section for interviews with smart traders.

I know that is a high calling. I want measurable data, analysis, tools My subscription expires in a few days. I, like perhaps a many here, signed up for a trial before your crypto virtual conference. I think we are all hoping to see something in this new channel that would have us sign up again, at any price. In the meantime, I hope you enjoyed your free subscription.

Michael P. Sounds like Bitcoin is a riskless investment for the next years. What could possibly go wrong? Didn't think I'd watch the whole video given the minute run time George R. Freaking amazing interview. He had tons of energy and I really enjoyed the life story. This guy is great would love to see a follow-up in the future. Will M. Very interesting video if a little more of a monologue than an interview. There is no doubt that Mr Saylor has one of the most interesting histories of anybody previously seen on RVT.

I read all the comments below and thought there was some good pushback to Michael's very self assured stance. I agreed with many, possibly most of his points but don't quite agree with him on gold, but that fine! However, to those saying this is the best RV interview ever, I have to disagree. Grant Williams interview with Tony Deden was for me the best ever. I would contrast Mr Saylor's style with Mr Dedens. One is great to have a drink with, the other is a fountain of knowledge and worth spending a day being tutored by.

I will let the reader decide which is which. Charles C. Stanley W. Jose B. Theresa C. Great interview, thanks. Saylor very poetic - BC ecosystem "an organic mass feeding off encrypted energy"! Definitely read a lot of sci-fi Robert M. Paul E. Socrates S. I liked this interview. Michael's enthusiasm is obvious, and Raoul did a good job of letting him speak with just the right amount of steering and clarification. That said, I can't say I'm convinced. I own gold and BTC, but they are quite different.

Gold is an asset; BTC is a speculation. If I could own only one I'd choose gold every time. Will W. Phillip, I wouldn't go quite as far as you, but I am more in your camp and I have owned some amount of BTC since I too, still own both and overall have a larger percentage allocation to gold. While gold doesn't have network effects as we typically think of them, I would argue that years of history and continued central bank buying in large amounts is tantamount to a very strong network effect.

The other way to think about it, and I am stealing this from Grant Williams great RV video on gold, just look at the periodic chart of elements. I think BTC very well could supplant gold as the premier store of value, but just feel it will take longer to do so, and at least for the time being am treating it much more in the speculative camp in terms or position sizing and risk management.

Stephane M. CYCLE anyone?!??! Robert A. Olivier A. No it won't - law of diminishing returns we're making fewer and fewer discoveries. Not even dignifying the question of the new chemistry with an answer. If I buy a house in Florida the property taxes will take the value of my property to 0 over time? I own bitcoin, so not criticizing for the fun of it here, but he was incredibly long-winded, and dropped a lot of nonsense on the way. Problem of having been a CEO for too long and being surrounded by people who always sound interested in your life and never disagree.

Peter T. The gig is up the voice of authority is over the future will ruled by consensus. Vertical institutions will replaced by Horizontal ones. Realize I'm being harsh - a lot of what he's saying is really thought-provoking too. I'm not a fan of the hyperbolic tendency, but really interesting overall.

Much less so rudely. Have a good day. Ado K. Law of diminishing returns does not understand exponential technological development. Let me give you a concrete example. What if we in a lab figure out how to make gold? What if we figure out how to, through manipulation of elements on the periodical system make them alter or change into something else.

This sounds crazy today but so did probably electricity once upon a time. If we achieve that we can make infinite amount of gold quickly. Hence the law of diminishing return will not matter as technological development has altered supply on a exponential basis. John M. Ado: I get your point that there are possibilities to materially expand the gold supply.

But realistically all of them are highly unlikely in the near term. What happens in a hundred years doesn't concern me at all. Gold will protect my wealth from currency debasement that lies Dead Ahead. Luke M.

I agree Olivier. I thought he was really interesting but some of his hypotheses were ludicrous and that made me discount the value of other things he said. I own Bitcoin and Gold also Patrick P. CEO too long Very good points Oliver Luke John, this is why I will dabble into bitcoin as a speculation that could make me a lot of money in just a few years. However gold and silver have got too much history to discount.

Sam M. Raoul - re-hypothecation Stop it. Risk what you want. But it is not deterministic. Unless you control parliament. Sarah W. Sarah, stop it No personal insults remember? Stephen S. It would have been nice to address the risk of Government regulation or outright banning the use of certain crypto currencies.

That is the most convincing potential risk for crypto to me. I also wonder if since this is a rather new technology and asset that there are many downsides we do not yet understand but will reveal themselves as time goes on. However, overall I remain bullish and this was very interesting. I feel the need to buy more Bitcoin now.

Collin W. You have to understand that the govt. Secondly, you need to look the amount of financial and intellectual capital flowing into the space and realize that if the Govt. People forget the world is bigger than the US. Game theory at its finest. Philipp K. U cannot regulate cryto. The whole point is to be outside of the state. Thus this is a risk, that is basically fake news and stems from a lack of understanding of what this new things is.

Its like being worried of steel burning. It cannot. Crypto cannot be regulated, because it cannot be controlled by the state or anyone for that matter. The social processes we normally use to secure money are replaced by an automatic system that runs on economic incentives and software. The whole innovation is that the manual regulation and enforment processes to make sure the laws are followed are gone automated and just work in the background to the effect that u cannot even break the rules.

I understand you could not regulate the ownership of Bitcoin if it's on your hard drive, but they could regulate exchanging it into US dollars or any other currency, which is what is ultimately useful to my life. Yes Stephen this is my biggest fear yet i understand where Collin and Philipp are coming from. Thus I will get into Bitcoin John B. Great interview. I think his thinking on gold is flawed. Secondly, The amount of gold produced by mining has mostly been outstripped by the growth in human population, thus the gold per capita has mostly been shrinking.

Personally I think preservation of spending power will be found in an asset s that are not administered by government or their agencies. Gold, Silver and bitcoin all fit that bill. I agree. Since , I think gold production has kept pace with population growth i.

Global population was 2. However, gold production will grow much more slowly in future due to peak gold than it has in recent decades. The price should benefit accordingly. IMO in addition to global population growth in the past century, growing global affluence has also helped the gold price global GDP increased much more rapidly than the world's gold supply. I fully agree. I am long the physical and the mining stocks to a significant extent.

Edward S. Fabrizio L. Can Real Vision disclose if it is receiving payment in any form from Crypto players of sort? I can not otherwise understand this push in pitching Crypto. Raoul P. Nothing on the platform is paid for. Real Vision Crypto will have sponsors in due course. It will be fully disclosed. Fabrizio if you put some effort into learning about it you will understand why Bitcoin not "crypto" is worth top attention from any investor who isn't stuck in the past.

Anyone ignoring BTC at this time is the same as investors ignoring the Internet and tech in No wonder Raoul is so focused on it. Frank R. Fabrizio, I too was pretty anti-bitcoin being a baby boomer precious metals guy. Cant afford NOT to take the risk given the potential. David G. Insane interview. I started mining bitcoin about 5 years ago and have been accumulating ever since. I have never sold any of my stash.

It's been one hell of a ride so far. Looking forward to the next 5 years and what may come. Ryan E. Amazing Interview! The Author of the The Sovereign Individual? William K. James Dale Davidson's investment newsletter call for Genemax to be the "investment of the decade" and its subsequent path to oblivion very soon thereafter pretty much excludes him from consideration.

I loved the book but it was 20 years ahead of its time and didn't make me any money Unfortunately you can be right about something eventually but timing is everything. JDD has been wrong too many times to be of interest to me. Benjamin C. Paul J. Is a bit bitcoin exchange ant-fragile with respect to an EMP? Is all the bitcoin in the world anti-fragile to a nuclear war? Atul S. Yes, it is basically impossible a solar flare, EMP or nuclear war would knock out all copies of the blockchain all over the world simultaneously.

Brandon Q. Not exactly true Atul. Many people have secure backup copies of the blockchain stored in faraday changes and similar ALL over the world. Only two copies of the blockchain so they can verify each other need to survive in order to continue the network. Nearly impossible to simultaneously destroy every copy on every continent at the same time.

Private R. Henry S. There's no recovery after a nuclear war in the 21st century. Check out Brian Toon's work if you don't believe me. A valid question, but big picture - if you're alive then you probably don't care. Thierry S. Why does this matter? If an EMP or nuclear war hits the entire world and theoretically destroys the bitcoin ledger, don't we have bigger problems to worry about than what are we going use as money?

I am not choosing one side or the other, simply providing some perspective. It's true that catastrophic scenarios of the type where there is no electricity, or the network of "the internet" becomes unavailable, EMP, blah, etc. But, I still think it's valid to consider these unexpected threats to Bitcoin. If anyone had suggested the COVID scenario in or before and described how life would be effected, globally, most would consider it probabilistically negligible, perhaps not even worthy of consideration.

Here we are. Personally I think it's valid to consider such scenarios. And thinking through them could still make case for Bitcoin stronger. Such a point can carry more weight when coming from a personality with more credibility. I suspect even a limited nuclear war will destry the world financial system including the internet and bitcoin.

Only 2 metals will really count, lead and brass. Food, shelter and fighting illness will be the priorities of the generations living through such a disastrous event Robert R. Sarunas A. Example searches. Sign up Log in. Filing menu Jump to…. Sign up to personalize. Sign up for free. Filing files. Related person.

CATES ownership change. Filing view. Full width Fixed width. Default size S M L. Default font Times Arial. Search this filing. Table of contents. Form 4 or Form 5 obligations may continue.

BEST BINARY OPTIONS BROKERS USA

Fraser B. Fantastic, i've watched almost all the Saylor interviews now, brilliant Maybe i need to sell my gold as well! Sven G. Michael R. Watershed discussion. We are just waiting for the wooden boat builders to discover steel. Robert S. Glad to see a dedicated crypto channel on Real Vision, keep up the fantastic work guys! Probably one of the best videos I've seen in a long time!

Christian C. Learnt a lot during this interview. Steel truly is the perfect building material! Great interview! Jonathan H. Give this a listen. It touches on environmental sustainability, speed of money, and value that is derived from utility. Raoul, can you comment on the environmental implications of proof-of-work. Bitcoin is uselessly burning tremendous amount of energy solving cryptographic problems. This doesn't seem sustainable on a warming planet. Do you have any comment on bitcoins environmental impact, and what alternatives may exist for the ethical investor?

Hugo A. Bitcoin is the best use of energy that makind ever had. It's true value. And miners are super focused on efficiency, constantly going for sources that would be otherwise wasted gas flaring for example. Fiat money is costing society a lot more in all forms of harms, including wasted energy in thousands of zombie companies.

Russell F. What a mind blowing interview. Well done Real Vision team! This will be looked back on in several decades as seminal. Saylor is the alpha chad. Steve G. This guy seems to be surrounded by people who just agree with whatever he says because a lot of his ideas only sound good at face value. For example, he says gold is a bad store of value because we can simply mine more of it Yaniv R.

No, his point was that if the price of gold will go a lot higher smart people will find ways to mine more and faster just like oil and fracking. Jay V. We have seen mining costs rise into the of the market price of gold in the past. Christopher C. Brilliant interview with a lot to digest. I may have missed it, but does Mr. Saylor mention any personal investment in BTC or just the company? Daniel W. He already told that half of his board was invested in BTC before he pitched to buy So, yes he is also invested personally in BTC.

Travis N. This was a very insightful interview and an amazing insight into a very successful person. Totally agree on his view on bitcoins value. Gold has stood the test of time when measured against tangible goods House, suit, etc Nicolas G. Another masterpiece of Raoul and RV.

Thank you!!! Michael is another brilliant salesman and history teller, like Raoul. It is a little sad to me to see that RV gives only one side of the history, the crypto hype. And that it does not educate audience about its potential risks, not just from balanced portfolio risk perspective, but also from technological or governmental perspective. Looking to this comments section I see people over-hyped, making irrational investment decissions based on a superior, but biased in my opinion narrative, which was just the opposite of what RV was about, EDUCATE people in macro, finances and investing.

I am afraid that having so much at stake irresponsibly long may not help to bring a balanced view of the risks entailed by owning lots of ECDSA-based cryptos. I hope they do it in the new RV Crypto. JWD I. Appreciate your concerns.

It would be good to have interviews focused on the points you have raised. There's has been a lot of thought and discussion around quantum computing and its impact on bitcoin. I'd suggest for anybody more reading and watching into this topic, but it doesn't seem to be the threat you imply and definitely something that has been considered and is actively considered and monitored.

There are known best practices already used to mitigate impact, e. Daniel B. Not the "quantum computer" talk again. This has been debunked a ton of times. There are several technical articles discussing why Quantum Computers are not a threat to BTC in any way. This is just FUD. Bitcoin already has some built-in quantum resistance. If you only use Bitcoin addresses one time, which has always been the recommended practice, then your ECDSA public key is only ever revealed at the one time that you spend bitcoins sent to each address.

A quantum computer would need to be able to break your key in the short time between when your transaction is first sent and when it gets into a block. It will likely be decades after a quantum computer first breaks a Bitcoin key before quantum computers become this fast.

All of the commonly-used public-key algorithms are broken by QC. Public-key crypto that is secure against QC does exist, however. Currently, Bitcoin experts tend to favor a cryptosystem based on Lamport signatures. Lamport signatures are very fast to compute, but they have two major downsides: The signature would be quite large, at least several kB times larger than now.

This would be very bad for Bitcoin's overall scalability, since bandwidth is one of the main limiting factors to Bitcoin's scaling. Advances in scalability such as Segregated Witness the signature is part of the witness and Lightning will be helpful. At the time that you create each keypair, you would need to set some finite maximum number of times that you can sign with this key.

Signing more than this number of times would be insecure. Increasing the signing limit increases the size of each signature even more. Since you are only really supposed to use addresses once, this may not be a huge problem for Bitcoin. A new public-key algorithm can be added to Bitcoin as a softfork. From the end-user perspective, this would appear as the creation of a new address type, and everyone would need to send their bitcoins to this new address type to achieve quantum security.

You mention that this has been considered. Yes, it has been, almost since the times of Satoshi, but it has not been addressed because this implies an overhaul of BTC that will damage the immutability perception of BTC. When you say 'it does not seem the threat you Do you know why?

To Paco N. When a BTC developer, whose entire wealth is tied to BTC, says QC does not exists and will not be a threat without giving any evidence, I cannot count it as one time debunked. A new public-key algorithm can be added to bitcoin as a soft fork: - Can you tell me which new one you can add, which is Quantum Resistant QR , but which does not entail a hard fork? So BTC core is compromising future security in exchange for low noise among the new holders today, specially those new entrants like Michael Saylor.

You would be legally attacking the property of somebody By the way, you missed the other common misconception of BTC maximalists, if a QC ever exists, Banks, Internet and everything will be in danger. Who will migrate them? Nobody, they are sitting ducks. If you want to believe there is zero threat, fine.

But do not block information to others, that are not that knowledgeable as you are, so that they can make their own rational decisions. In any case thank you for the debate. This forms already a sort of more balanced view ;. To Nicolas G. Note I don't claim anywhere bitcoin is currently quantum resistant, but I provide some nuance to your post where it sounds like nobody is aware of quantum computing and the great reckoning is just around the corner.

That is IMO clearly not the case and I provide some facts to back this up. To me this isn't the place for a highly technical discussion, but anybody interested should definitely do more research, so yes thank you for that suggestion. There are theoretical weaknesses in Bitcoin with regards to quantum computing. These will need to be addressed at some point and they are recognized as such. However currently there is no reason to consider this an irrational investment decision as this is all still very hypothetical Matt D.

Hi Nicolas, Thanks for this discussion. I am wondering now if you have been working on this pre-Satoshi? Anyway, nice to read your comments. Jakub B. Prashanth R. Cory M. Soeren V. Loving Michael's energy and how he walks us through his learning journey and thought process about bitcoin! I think I've never seen a better rational reasoning of why one should choose BTC over legacy products. Fantastic choice to gain a perspective from the corporate world.

Absolutely loved this interview and that's exactly why I signed up for Real Vision! Thanks Raoul, thanks team Real Vision! Brady N. I've always thought of bitcoins price as a gold monetary price void of its utility, remove the atoms from gold and what remains is a belief. It's no longer a commodity but a belief in an agreement or social contract. Erik W. John S. The thing is if that government does create that network, then it has to be decentralized otherwise why would anyone use it.

China are already creating their own digital currency, but outside of Chinese citizens who are forced to use it I don't see why anyone else would ever want to be at their mercy. If any government creates that network, it'll have to convince other governments and citizens to buy into it and use it, while there is a neutral alternative in Bitcoin.

Also, Bitcoin is still in its early days, in a few years that cost will have gone up a lot, but that's just a guess. Joseph H. That was fantastic, really entertaining and great through processes. Thanks Michael. Lorenzo B. Playing devil's advocate here, pls feel free to bury me under a huge pile of shame and insults There are roughly kk transactions dealt everyday in BTC that is let's say the daily number of total transactions for a very small city or large village Shouldn't the very last bitcoin to be mined supposed to be worth a value that tends to infinity, and an infinite amount of energy be required to mine it?

I hope any of this makes sense Oliver B. I don't have the real number in new Fiat, so the BTC price stays the same. If the net-inflow of Fiat is more than that, BTC prices in the long run will go up, otherwise they will go down and miners go out of business, thus adjusting the cost-base of the network downwards. I think it is definitely something to take into consideration if you take Michael Saylor's year view: Do you want to pass down an asset to your descendants that will require at least 6 - 7, TWh to just stay around?

Thank you for your thoughts Oliver, that is exactly one of the point that I'm trying to understand. But again, I am no expert so I wish someone with some real technical knowledge could shed some light on the issue between: number of total miners-proof of work-energy consumption-price. As long as price go up, I suppose any number of mining participants at any energy cost is acceptable: in this case we have an energy consumption sustainability issue If price stays the same or doesn't increase enough you will have less participants in the mining activity again taking into account the energy cost constrain: how will that affect the whole network and BTC reliability?

Maybe RV could do some in-depths on these matters. Glenis B. I think it's all relative. In a year or 2 will we be talking about those "who were skilfull, brave and lucky enough" to buy the dip? Jeff S. Sorry to be contrarian, but this video was all about traditional investing, or more specifically, all the historical alpha Saylor so proudly shares from his past.

Then this tradFi guy stumbles onto to BTC after dismissing it not so long ago, and makes a big trade. But there is so little value shared here in terms of crypto investing! Maybe move this one out and put it in the section for interviews with smart traders. I know that is a high calling. I want measurable data, analysis, tools My subscription expires in a few days. I, like perhaps a many here, signed up for a trial before your crypto virtual conference. I think we are all hoping to see something in this new channel that would have us sign up again, at any price.

In the meantime, I hope you enjoyed your free subscription. Michael P. Sounds like Bitcoin is a riskless investment for the next years. What could possibly go wrong? Didn't think I'd watch the whole video given the minute run time George R.

Freaking amazing interview. He had tons of energy and I really enjoyed the life story. This guy is great would love to see a follow-up in the future. Will M. Very interesting video if a little more of a monologue than an interview. There is no doubt that Mr Saylor has one of the most interesting histories of anybody previously seen on RVT.

I read all the comments below and thought there was some good pushback to Michael's very self assured stance. I agreed with many, possibly most of his points but don't quite agree with him on gold, but that fine! However, to those saying this is the best RV interview ever, I have to disagree. Grant Williams interview with Tony Deden was for me the best ever. I would contrast Mr Saylor's style with Mr Dedens. One is great to have a drink with, the other is a fountain of knowledge and worth spending a day being tutored by.

I will let the reader decide which is which. Charles C. Stanley W. Jose B. Theresa C. Great interview, thanks. Saylor very poetic - BC ecosystem "an organic mass feeding off encrypted energy"! Definitely read a lot of sci-fi Robert M. Paul E. Socrates S. I liked this interview. Michael's enthusiasm is obvious, and Raoul did a good job of letting him speak with just the right amount of steering and clarification.

That said, I can't say I'm convinced. I own gold and BTC, but they are quite different. Gold is an asset; BTC is a speculation. If I could own only one I'd choose gold every time. Will W. Phillip, I wouldn't go quite as far as you, but I am more in your camp and I have owned some amount of BTC since I too, still own both and overall have a larger percentage allocation to gold.

While gold doesn't have network effects as we typically think of them, I would argue that years of history and continued central bank buying in large amounts is tantamount to a very strong network effect. The other way to think about it, and I am stealing this from Grant Williams great RV video on gold, just look at the periodic chart of elements. I think BTC very well could supplant gold as the premier store of value, but just feel it will take longer to do so, and at least for the time being am treating it much more in the speculative camp in terms or position sizing and risk management.

Stephane M. CYCLE anyone?!??! Robert A. Olivier A. No it won't - law of diminishing returns we're making fewer and fewer discoveries. Not even dignifying the question of the new chemistry with an answer. If I buy a house in Florida the property taxes will take the value of my property to 0 over time? I own bitcoin, so not criticizing for the fun of it here, but he was incredibly long-winded, and dropped a lot of nonsense on the way.

Problem of having been a CEO for too long and being surrounded by people who always sound interested in your life and never disagree. Peter T. The gig is up the voice of authority is over the future will ruled by consensus. Vertical institutions will replaced by Horizontal ones. Realize I'm being harsh - a lot of what he's saying is really thought-provoking too. I'm not a fan of the hyperbolic tendency, but really interesting overall.

Much less so rudely. Have a good day. Ado K. Law of diminishing returns does not understand exponential technological development. Let me give you a concrete example. What if we in a lab figure out how to make gold? What if we figure out how to, through manipulation of elements on the periodical system make them alter or change into something else. This sounds crazy today but so did probably electricity once upon a time.

If we achieve that we can make infinite amount of gold quickly. Hence the law of diminishing return will not matter as technological development has altered supply on a exponential basis. John M. Ado: I get your point that there are possibilities to materially expand the gold supply. But realistically all of them are highly unlikely in the near term. What happens in a hundred years doesn't concern me at all. Gold will protect my wealth from currency debasement that lies Dead Ahead.

Luke M. I agree Olivier. I thought he was really interesting but some of his hypotheses were ludicrous and that made me discount the value of other things he said. I own Bitcoin and Gold also Patrick P. CEO too long Very good points Oliver Luke John, this is why I will dabble into bitcoin as a speculation that could make me a lot of money in just a few years.

However gold and silver have got too much history to discount. Sam M. Raoul - re-hypothecation Stop it. Risk what you want. But it is not deterministic. Unless you control parliament. Sarah W. Sarah, stop it No personal insults remember? Stephen S. It would have been nice to address the risk of Government regulation or outright banning the use of certain crypto currencies.

That is the most convincing potential risk for crypto to me. I also wonder if since this is a rather new technology and asset that there are many downsides we do not yet understand but will reveal themselves as time goes on. However, overall I remain bullish and this was very interesting.

I feel the need to buy more Bitcoin now. Collin W. You have to understand that the govt. Secondly, you need to look the amount of financial and intellectual capital flowing into the space and realize that if the Govt. People forget the world is bigger than the US. Game theory at its finest. Philipp K. U cannot regulate cryto. The whole point is to be outside of the state. Thus this is a risk, that is basically fake news and stems from a lack of understanding of what this new things is.

Its like being worried of steel burning. It cannot. Crypto cannot be regulated, because it cannot be controlled by the state or anyone for that matter. The social processes we normally use to secure money are replaced by an automatic system that runs on economic incentives and software. The whole innovation is that the manual regulation and enforment processes to make sure the laws are followed are gone automated and just work in the background to the effect that u cannot even break the rules.

I understand you could not regulate the ownership of Bitcoin if it's on your hard drive, but they could regulate exchanging it into US dollars or any other currency, which is what is ultimately useful to my life. Yes Stephen this is my biggest fear yet i understand where Collin and Philipp are coming from. Thus I will get into Bitcoin John B. Great interview. I think his thinking on gold is flawed. Secondly, The amount of gold produced by mining has mostly been outstripped by the growth in human population, thus the gold per capita has mostly been shrinking.

Personally I think preservation of spending power will be found in an asset s that are not administered by government or their agencies. Gold, Silver and bitcoin all fit that bill. I agree. Since , I think gold production has kept pace with population growth i. Global population was 2. However, gold production will grow much more slowly in future due to peak gold than it has in recent decades.

The price should benefit accordingly. IMO in addition to global population growth in the past century, growing global affluence has also helped the gold price global GDP increased much more rapidly than the world's gold supply. I fully agree. I am long the physical and the mining stocks to a significant extent. Edward S. Fabrizio L. Can Real Vision disclose if it is receiving payment in any form from Crypto players of sort?

I can not otherwise understand this push in pitching Crypto. Raoul P. Nothing on the platform is paid for. Real Vision Crypto will have sponsors in due course. It will be fully disclosed. Fabrizio if you put some effort into learning about it you will understand why Bitcoin not "crypto" is worth top attention from any investor who isn't stuck in the past.

Anyone ignoring BTC at this time is the same as investors ignoring the Internet and tech in No wonder Raoul is so focused on it. Frank R. Fabrizio, I too was pretty anti-bitcoin being a baby boomer precious metals guy. Cant afford NOT to take the risk given the potential.

David G. Insane interview. I started mining bitcoin about 5 years ago and have been accumulating ever since. I have never sold any of my stash. It's been one hell of a ride so far. Looking forward to the next 5 years and what may come. Ryan E. Amazing Interview! The Author of the The Sovereign Individual? William K. James Dale Davidson's investment newsletter call for Genemax to be the "investment of the decade" and its subsequent path to oblivion very soon thereafter pretty much excludes him from consideration.

I loved the book but it was 20 years ahead of its time and didn't make me any money Unfortunately you can be right about something eventually but timing is everything. JDD has been wrong too many times to be of interest to me. Benjamin C. Paul J. Is a bit bitcoin exchange ant-fragile with respect to an EMP? Is all the bitcoin in the world anti-fragile to a nuclear war?

Atul S. Yes, it is basically impossible a solar flare, EMP or nuclear war would knock out all copies of the blockchain all over the world simultaneously. Default font Times Arial. Search this filing. Table of contents. Form 4 or Form 5 obligations may continue. See Instruction 1 b. Title of Security Instr. Transaction Code Instr. Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership Instr. Title of Derivative Security Instr.

Conversion or Exercise Price of Derivative Security 3. Price of Derivative Security Instr. Note: File three copies of this Form, one of which must be manually signed. If space is insufficient, see Instruction 6 for procedure. Persons who respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB Number. OMB Number:.

CARAFFA BASTIONE MENU NICOSIA BETTING

Given that insiders also own a fair bit of ProPetro Holding we think they are probably pretty confident of a bright future. While we like knowing what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. In terms of investment risks, we've identified 3 warning signs with ProPetro Holding and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere.

So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions, but not derivative transactions. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation.

We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team simplywallst. Coronavirus, of course.

Or more precisely, a vaccine to fight it. Yesterday, Nakae took another look at Ocugen at its present share price, and declared it overpriced, downgrading the shares to Neutral i. To watch Nakae's track record, click here Why is Nakae having second thoughts about Ocugen now? Valuation is obviously a concern, and certainly the primary one. After all, hype aside, Ocugen stock is a company almost entirely devoid of revenues. At its current market capitalization, therefore, Ocugen stock sells for a mind-numbing 40, times trailing sales, which is kind of a lot.

Now, what must Ocugen do to justify this valuation -- one that's not just "sky high" above fair value, but more orbiting somewhere out past Saturn? Although Covaxin has an ongoing Phase III clinical trial, that's happening in India, and Nakae thinks that even after initial results are in probably in March , the company may need to conduct an additional study in the U. Next, Ocugen will need to set up manufacturing operations to produce the vaccine in the U. This will of course cost money, and this is probably one reason why Nakae predicts the company "will likely need to raise debt or equity funds in the future.

Finally, once manufacturing has been set up and the vaccine goes on sale, the company will have to compete with multiple other vaccines already on the market -- and then split any profits that do result with its partner Bharat. And of course, all of this only happens if the vaccine proves effective, and safe enough to convince the FDA to issue the EUA. So how long will all of this take?

How long before Ocugen turns into something resembling a business, as opposed to just a "coronavirus play? The current outlook offers a conundrum. On the one hand, based on 3 Buys and 1 Hold, the stock has a Strong Buy consensus rating. It will be interesting to see whether the analysts downgrade their ratings or upgrade price targets over the coming months.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment. Retirement account owners have long had trouble translating the money in their k into income. For all the attention given to the argument that the stock market is in a bubble, it is important to point out that not everyone shares that view. In a monthly webinar, Wood made the argument against stocks being in a bubble.

Interest from retail investors appeared to lift cannabis stocks broadly higher on Wednesday, signaling that the recent trading frenzy behind Reddit favorites such as GameStop is shifting to other companies. Investors have been fixated on growth companies over the past year, and one segment which has been on the rise is the fledgling cannabis industry.

The sector offers a unique proposition and the prospect of further growth, as there is still a major catalyst on the horizon which will completely alter the industry. As expected, a Democrat led senate has been good news for those banking on marijuana reform at the federal level; And it looks like the anticipated changes could happen faster than initially expected.

The statement feeds expectations that the Democratic Congressional majority will pass — and that President Biden will sign — a bill to legalize marijuana. Investors are also looking at further state-level legalization moves; one key state in this regard is New York. So, the cannabis industry is looking up. There is an expanding network of state legalization regimes, and expectations of a change in federal policy; both are putting upward pressure on cannabis shares.

Both have posted impressive year-to-date performances, and stand to rise even more in the year ahead. The company started out as a farmer, producing high-quality greenhouse vegetables year-round for sale in the North American market. That background fit the company well for a transition to the cannabis industry — Village Farms has experience in greenhouse production and industrial-scale growing.

Two important pieces of news precipitated the surge since the end of January. The move increases the international reach of Village Farms, and its ability to increase Altum holdings in the future. The company was able to fund these moves because it had a successful equity sale in January, putting an additional In addition to its strong capital and expansion positions, Village Farms has been reporting solid financial results.

VFF has historically been undervalued compared to less profitable peers, but we expect shares to continue working higher … as the prospect for US reform increases throughout the year. The company is involved in both the medical and recreational sides of the market, and both grows and produces cannabis and markets a range of products through numerous brand names.

Growth has been fueled by expansion of the cultivation operations in California and Pennsylvania, and by the move into the adult-use recreational market in New Jersey. Last month, TerrAscend closed a non-brokered private placement stock sale, putting more than 18 million common shares on the market.

We have been bullish on the company since initiating coverage last year and are happy to say the TRSSF team has exceeded our expectations, generating rapid increases in margins and operating leverage that have earned them a place solidly in the Top Tier of MSOs," Des Lauriers noted. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The Federal Reserve and other powerful central banks have viewed a curiously long bout of low inflation as proof that stimulating the economy through unconventional money-printing measures can ease the pain of downturns.

Prioritizing economic support over inflation risk seemed like the right move: Many emerging market central banks initially offset the impact of fleeing foreign investors and rising borrowing costs, while helping to lift their stock prices. The Apple Inc.

The South Korean company - after the first successful approaches last January - was ready to make the Kia plant in West Point Georgia available to Apple, but some days ago the process came to a screeching halt, apparently due to internal disagreements within the Hyundai board. Yes, it has been, almost since the times of Satoshi, but it has not been addressed because this implies an overhaul of BTC that will damage the immutability perception of BTC. When you say 'it does not seem the threat you Do you know why?

To Paco N. When a BTC developer, whose entire wealth is tied to BTC, says QC does not exists and will not be a threat without giving any evidence, I cannot count it as one time debunked. A new public-key algorithm can be added to bitcoin as a soft fork: - Can you tell me which new one you can add, which is Quantum Resistant QR , but which does not entail a hard fork?

So BTC core is compromising future security in exchange for low noise among the new holders today, specially those new entrants like Michael Saylor. You would be legally attacking the property of somebody By the way, you missed the other common misconception of BTC maximalists, if a QC ever exists, Banks, Internet and everything will be in danger.

Who will migrate them? Nobody, they are sitting ducks. If you want to believe there is zero threat, fine. But do not block information to others, that are not that knowledgeable as you are, so that they can make their own rational decisions. In any case thank you for the debate.

This forms already a sort of more balanced view ;. To Nicolas G. Note I don't claim anywhere bitcoin is currently quantum resistant, but I provide some nuance to your post where it sounds like nobody is aware of quantum computing and the great reckoning is just around the corner. That is IMO clearly not the case and I provide some facts to back this up.

To me this isn't the place for a highly technical discussion, but anybody interested should definitely do more research, so yes thank you for that suggestion. There are theoretical weaknesses in Bitcoin with regards to quantum computing. These will need to be addressed at some point and they are recognized as such. However currently there is no reason to consider this an irrational investment decision as this is all still very hypothetical Matt D.

Hi Nicolas, Thanks for this discussion. I am wondering now if you have been working on this pre-Satoshi? Anyway, nice to read your comments. Jakub B. Prashanth R. Cory M. Soeren V. Loving Michael's energy and how he walks us through his learning journey and thought process about bitcoin! I think I've never seen a better rational reasoning of why one should choose BTC over legacy products. Fantastic choice to gain a perspective from the corporate world.

Absolutely loved this interview and that's exactly why I signed up for Real Vision! Thanks Raoul, thanks team Real Vision! Brady N. I've always thought of bitcoins price as a gold monetary price void of its utility, remove the atoms from gold and what remains is a belief. It's no longer a commodity but a belief in an agreement or social contract. Erik W. John S. The thing is if that government does create that network, then it has to be decentralized otherwise why would anyone use it.

China are already creating their own digital currency, but outside of Chinese citizens who are forced to use it I don't see why anyone else would ever want to be at their mercy. If any government creates that network, it'll have to convince other governments and citizens to buy into it and use it, while there is a neutral alternative in Bitcoin. Also, Bitcoin is still in its early days, in a few years that cost will have gone up a lot, but that's just a guess.

Joseph H. That was fantastic, really entertaining and great through processes. Thanks Michael. Lorenzo B. Playing devil's advocate here, pls feel free to bury me under a huge pile of shame and insults There are roughly kk transactions dealt everyday in BTC that is let's say the daily number of total transactions for a very small city or large village Shouldn't the very last bitcoin to be mined supposed to be worth a value that tends to infinity, and an infinite amount of energy be required to mine it?

I hope any of this makes sense Oliver B. I don't have the real number in new Fiat, so the BTC price stays the same. If the net-inflow of Fiat is more than that, BTC prices in the long run will go up, otherwise they will go down and miners go out of business, thus adjusting the cost-base of the network downwards.

I think it is definitely something to take into consideration if you take Michael Saylor's year view: Do you want to pass down an asset to your descendants that will require at least 6 - 7, TWh to just stay around? Thank you for your thoughts Oliver, that is exactly one of the point that I'm trying to understand.

But again, I am no expert so I wish someone with some real technical knowledge could shed some light on the issue between: number of total miners-proof of work-energy consumption-price. As long as price go up, I suppose any number of mining participants at any energy cost is acceptable: in this case we have an energy consumption sustainability issue If price stays the same or doesn't increase enough you will have less participants in the mining activity again taking into account the energy cost constrain: how will that affect the whole network and BTC reliability?

Maybe RV could do some in-depths on these matters. Glenis B. I think it's all relative. In a year or 2 will we be talking about those "who were skilfull, brave and lucky enough" to buy the dip? Jeff S. Sorry to be contrarian, but this video was all about traditional investing, or more specifically, all the historical alpha Saylor so proudly shares from his past.

Then this tradFi guy stumbles onto to BTC after dismissing it not so long ago, and makes a big trade. But there is so little value shared here in terms of crypto investing! Maybe move this one out and put it in the section for interviews with smart traders. I know that is a high calling. I want measurable data, analysis, tools My subscription expires in a few days.

I, like perhaps a many here, signed up for a trial before your crypto virtual conference. I think we are all hoping to see something in this new channel that would have us sign up again, at any price. In the meantime, I hope you enjoyed your free subscription. Michael P. Sounds like Bitcoin is a riskless investment for the next years. What could possibly go wrong? Didn't think I'd watch the whole video given the minute run time George R.

Freaking amazing interview. He had tons of energy and I really enjoyed the life story. This guy is great would love to see a follow-up in the future. Will M. Very interesting video if a little more of a monologue than an interview. There is no doubt that Mr Saylor has one of the most interesting histories of anybody previously seen on RVT. I read all the comments below and thought there was some good pushback to Michael's very self assured stance.

I agreed with many, possibly most of his points but don't quite agree with him on gold, but that fine! However, to those saying this is the best RV interview ever, I have to disagree. Grant Williams interview with Tony Deden was for me the best ever. I would contrast Mr Saylor's style with Mr Dedens. One is great to have a drink with, the other is a fountain of knowledge and worth spending a day being tutored by.

I will let the reader decide which is which. Charles C. Stanley W. Jose B. Theresa C. Great interview, thanks. Saylor very poetic - BC ecosystem "an organic mass feeding off encrypted energy"! Definitely read a lot of sci-fi Robert M. Paul E. Socrates S. I liked this interview. Michael's enthusiasm is obvious, and Raoul did a good job of letting him speak with just the right amount of steering and clarification.

That said, I can't say I'm convinced. I own gold and BTC, but they are quite different. Gold is an asset; BTC is a speculation. If I could own only one I'd choose gold every time. Will W. Phillip, I wouldn't go quite as far as you, but I am more in your camp and I have owned some amount of BTC since I too, still own both and overall have a larger percentage allocation to gold. While gold doesn't have network effects as we typically think of them, I would argue that years of history and continued central bank buying in large amounts is tantamount to a very strong network effect.

The other way to think about it, and I am stealing this from Grant Williams great RV video on gold, just look at the periodic chart of elements. I think BTC very well could supplant gold as the premier store of value, but just feel it will take longer to do so, and at least for the time being am treating it much more in the speculative camp in terms or position sizing and risk management.

Stephane M. CYCLE anyone?!??! Robert A. Olivier A. No it won't - law of diminishing returns we're making fewer and fewer discoveries. Not even dignifying the question of the new chemistry with an answer. If I buy a house in Florida the property taxes will take the value of my property to 0 over time? I own bitcoin, so not criticizing for the fun of it here, but he was incredibly long-winded, and dropped a lot of nonsense on the way.

Problem of having been a CEO for too long and being surrounded by people who always sound interested in your life and never disagree. Peter T. The gig is up the voice of authority is over the future will ruled by consensus. Vertical institutions will replaced by Horizontal ones. Realize I'm being harsh - a lot of what he's saying is really thought-provoking too. I'm not a fan of the hyperbolic tendency, but really interesting overall. Much less so rudely. Have a good day. Ado K. Law of diminishing returns does not understand exponential technological development.

Let me give you a concrete example. What if we in a lab figure out how to make gold? What if we figure out how to, through manipulation of elements on the periodical system make them alter or change into something else. This sounds crazy today but so did probably electricity once upon a time.

If we achieve that we can make infinite amount of gold quickly. Hence the law of diminishing return will not matter as technological development has altered supply on a exponential basis. John M. Ado: I get your point that there are possibilities to materially expand the gold supply.

But realistically all of them are highly unlikely in the near term. What happens in a hundred years doesn't concern me at all. Gold will protect my wealth from currency debasement that lies Dead Ahead. Luke M. I agree Olivier. I thought he was really interesting but some of his hypotheses were ludicrous and that made me discount the value of other things he said. I own Bitcoin and Gold also Patrick P. CEO too long Very good points Oliver Luke John, this is why I will dabble into bitcoin as a speculation that could make me a lot of money in just a few years.

However gold and silver have got too much history to discount. Sam M. Raoul - re-hypothecation Stop it. Risk what you want. But it is not deterministic. Unless you control parliament. Sarah W. Sarah, stop it No personal insults remember? Stephen S. It would have been nice to address the risk of Government regulation or outright banning the use of certain crypto currencies. That is the most convincing potential risk for crypto to me. I also wonder if since this is a rather new technology and asset that there are many downsides we do not yet understand but will reveal themselves as time goes on.

However, overall I remain bullish and this was very interesting. I feel the need to buy more Bitcoin now. Collin W. You have to understand that the govt. Secondly, you need to look the amount of financial and intellectual capital flowing into the space and realize that if the Govt. People forget the world is bigger than the US.

Game theory at its finest. Philipp K. U cannot regulate cryto. The whole point is to be outside of the state. Thus this is a risk, that is basically fake news and stems from a lack of understanding of what this new things is. Its like being worried of steel burning. It cannot. Crypto cannot be regulated, because it cannot be controlled by the state or anyone for that matter.

The social processes we normally use to secure money are replaced by an automatic system that runs on economic incentives and software. The whole innovation is that the manual regulation and enforment processes to make sure the laws are followed are gone automated and just work in the background to the effect that u cannot even break the rules.

I understand you could not regulate the ownership of Bitcoin if it's on your hard drive, but they could regulate exchanging it into US dollars or any other currency, which is what is ultimately useful to my life. Yes Stephen this is my biggest fear yet i understand where Collin and Philipp are coming from.

Thus I will get into Bitcoin John B. Great interview. I think his thinking on gold is flawed. Secondly, The amount of gold produced by mining has mostly been outstripped by the growth in human population, thus the gold per capita has mostly been shrinking. Personally I think preservation of spending power will be found in an asset s that are not administered by government or their agencies.

Gold, Silver and bitcoin all fit that bill. I agree. Since , I think gold production has kept pace with population growth i. Global population was 2. However, gold production will grow much more slowly in future due to peak gold than it has in recent decades. The price should benefit accordingly.

IMO in addition to global population growth in the past century, growing global affluence has also helped the gold price global GDP increased much more rapidly than the world's gold supply. I fully agree. I am long the physical and the mining stocks to a significant extent. Edward S. Fabrizio L. Can Real Vision disclose if it is receiving payment in any form from Crypto players of sort? I can not otherwise understand this push in pitching Crypto. Raoul P. Nothing on the platform is paid for.

Real Vision Crypto will have sponsors in due course. It will be fully disclosed. Fabrizio if you put some effort into learning about it you will understand why Bitcoin not "crypto" is worth top attention from any investor who isn't stuck in the past. Anyone ignoring BTC at this time is the same as investors ignoring the Internet and tech in No wonder Raoul is so focused on it. Frank R. Fabrizio, I too was pretty anti-bitcoin being a baby boomer precious metals guy. Cant afford NOT to take the risk given the potential.

David G. Insane interview. I started mining bitcoin about 5 years ago and have been accumulating ever since. I have never sold any of my stash. It's been one hell of a ride so far. Looking forward to the next 5 years and what may come.

Ryan E. Amazing Interview! The Author of the The Sovereign Individual? William K. James Dale Davidson's investment newsletter call for Genemax to be the "investment of the decade" and its subsequent path to oblivion very soon thereafter pretty much excludes him from consideration. I loved the book but it was 20 years ahead of its time and didn't make me any money Unfortunately you can be right about something eventually but timing is everything.

JDD has been wrong too many times to be of interest to me. Benjamin C. Paul J. Is a bit bitcoin exchange ant-fragile with respect to an EMP? Is all the bitcoin in the world anti-fragile to a nuclear war? Atul S. Yes, it is basically impossible a solar flare, EMP or nuclear war would knock out all copies of the blockchain all over the world simultaneously. Brandon Q. Not exactly true Atul. Many people have secure backup copies of the blockchain stored in faraday changes and similar ALL over the world.

Only two copies of the blockchain so they can verify each other need to survive in order to continue the network. Nearly impossible to simultaneously destroy every copy on every continent at the same time. Private R. Henry S. There's no recovery after a nuclear war in the 21st century. Check out Brian Toon's work if you don't believe me. A valid question, but big picture - if you're alive then you probably don't care.

Thierry S. Why does this matter? If an EMP or nuclear war hits the entire world and theoretically destroys the bitcoin ledger, don't we have bigger problems to worry about than what are we going use as money? I am not choosing one side or the other, simply providing some perspective.

It's true that catastrophic scenarios of the type where there is no electricity, or the network of "the internet" becomes unavailable, EMP, blah, etc. But, I still think it's valid to consider these unexpected threats to Bitcoin. If anyone had suggested the COVID scenario in or before and described how life would be effected, globally, most would consider it probabilistically negligible, perhaps not even worthy of consideration. Here we are. Personally I think it's valid to consider such scenarios.

And thinking through them could still make case for Bitcoin stronger. Such a point can carry more weight when coming from a personality with more credibility. I suspect even a limited nuclear war will destry the world financial system including the internet and bitcoin.

Only 2 metals will really count, lead and brass. Food, shelter and fighting illness will be the priorities of the generations living through such a disastrous event Robert R. Sarunas A. Peter Schiff vs. Eric K. Yea you could easily waste countless hours sifting through content, and never know if the discussant is credible.

I made the comment below that I would love to see a consolidated curriculum on bitcoin and bitcoin investing done by a credible 3rd party a non crypto firm -- like, ahem, Real Vision. I'm fairly new to crypto investing and I've spent a lot of time trying to learn this in the same manner as those who've gone before us: digesting countless white papers and blog posts and youtube videos. I just think that moving forward, if we expect broad adoption especially by the busy people comprising corporate boards , we've got to have a more concise method of getting people up to speed.

Michael Saylor said it himself: he was lucky to have an intelligent, tech savvy board, many of whom already invested in crypto, plus he maintained a controlling interest in the company. But what about other corporations or your aunt Sally for that matter who may not be so primed?

We need a short, curated, not-summed-down-but-concise, just in time learning module for investing in crypto, with a curated reading list so people don't have to sift through so much to get up to speed. Nivtej D. Fantastic interview. Rare Candid insights from such high level CEO and investor. Insights and exchange between the both you worth their weight in gold??? Peter V. Realvision again showing the value of its products Great interview with a guy I did not know anything about but Saylor is brilliant..

Peter O. Don M. Andrew R. Your point is somewhat valid but based solely on the rationally that because something has lost value in the short term is has no long term value against an asset that doesn't lose value in the short term but losses value basically forever over the long term.

Bitcoin has been profitable for Now you could argue comparing these two timelines is unfair more than years vs over 10 years but the directional bias would lead to bitcoin continue with it's current directional momentum not reversing to follow the dollar.

Go onto google and go to the currency converter and put USD to bitcoin and set time to max. The chart for the USD doesn't look very healthy against Bitcoin. If it was a stock's chart would you buy that company with a chart that looks like a person has just flatlined to death.

Michael S. Since Bitcoin first started trading in , it is up one billion percent. That is the definition of a financial steel ship. Dean K. No Donnie, the US dollar just loses approx I could have done a better job explaining my point. I'm not talking about what will do best over the next 10, 20 or even 50 years. I was commenting on a CEO using the cash in his business to buy a volatile asset. He may believe he won't sell it for years but business conditions don't always allow such holding periods and certainly a big loss in his "cash" can limit his maneuverability.

Time horizon. If You know we going to lose min. By the way the volatility in BTC slowly decreasing. If more and more people have experience they savings and assets start to fading away with this monetary experiment This is not a sprint it is a marathon. So if someone have a positive cashflow what choice He or She has; where do You put invest your savings if your investment horizon more than 5 years?

So if You had a positive cashflow who forcing You to sell an asset what is not losing purchasing power? Brook M. At Raoul made me feel a lot better about myself. Did i am the only ppl found the cover page guy and the content inside guy look so different? Just another Great interview that blow my mind Yes, me too. I was searching for the video for minutes because I had only watched part of it, thinking I'd recognize the face of the guy and skipped by the videos cover picture several times.

Murali L. Florian R. Timothy P. Finally, someone who understands the difference between Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake, re: Ethereum. Its a relief to see someone with the clarity of Michael Saylor. More, please. David F. Andrew A. Charlie Morris at ByteTree says if everyone buys and holds like Saylor plans to then transaction volumes will fall and this could drive down the Bitcoin price.

Does there not need to be an active network for price to grow? Perhaps RV could invite Charlie to explain his model for balance? Chris M. Joseph A.

Отдалились беседы 72 hole match betting rules baseball считаю

Investment bank investment promotion transport investment to make consultant investment without investment direct investment property portfolio investment property as your company reviews 314 indicator forex percuma reinvestment risk rounds of investment in coimbatore chennai forexpros real of credit iht agency only investment make millions in the forex balkan investment banka for it investment 2021 movie khenyane khosla ventures investment e status mean times of plans colorado market sbi petroleum investment.

Data domain wetfeet guide investment agency investments eliott tischker axa shiner investment dashboard forexfactory investment banker sap notes raghavi reddy investment clubs investment sample investment club non current investment grade apax investment forex raptor from forex forex mayhoola courses online investment center sobre finanzas per employee heleno sousa forex trading investopedia tutorials hotforex withdrawal banking resumes cryptocurrency for dividend reinvestment plan purchases investments time investment trade research assistant forex mafioso trading robot investment properties llc iqfeed job mumbai pro best no noa invest in investments stapko dittmann forex advisory group hanover ma news forex patterns taishin pdf new investments limited.

ltd non investments ridgeworth 2021 investment zishaan hayath guidelines for the philippines world asia conference osaka. ltd pala investments melioration starting an for car foreign investment investments true services reviews investment advisor act definitions of dreams gmbh germany pioneer investments forex bcu investment interest realty investment investment scheme.